This topic of Global Warming has been put on the back seat now for some time. The current interest from the media continues to be the dramatic developments in the presidential race. I for one are more concerned about what the future of the country will bring and hoe we will handle this, not just the theatrical antics of getting elected. Mr. DiCaprio is correct in asserting that to negate the effects we are having on the earth and to argue against them is going against significant empirical data and evidence.
There are many complex and differentiating opinions and actions that all sorts of very smart and well qualified people will try and propose to “solve” the critical situation in Syria. Ranging from total U.S. invasion to complete departure from any sort of intervention.
Both options seem excessive and both options will undoubtedly cause greater loss of life. unfortunately it almost boils down to which is the lesser of two evils. Do we let a country destroy itself? Or do we as a capable sovereign nation intervene?
The technological advancements in the last 100 years far outpace and outmatch the advancement of the last 10,000. This is a fact. We now have ways to treat all sorts of disease from hepatitis C to easing the suffering of AIDS patients. The great news is that this is only getting better as we move more and more into the future. Greater advancements will mean more treatable diseases and longer lives and hopefully less suffering from humanity. The real problems will come with food and water shortages reach a real critical level, but that is a conversation for another post.